๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐(๐ข๐)
๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ (๐๐ค-๐๐ค ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ): ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ซ. ๐๐ฒ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ@๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ง.๐ฒ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ฎ.๐๐
If the late nineties and early oughts witnessed what Leigh Gilmore has termed a โmemoir boomโ, the intervening years have seen the rise of a new genre: autofiction. Coined by Serge Doubrovsky in 1977 and initially associated with French writers, the termโand the self-fictionalizing practices it designatesโhave exploded into the international mainstream.
Although there is no critical consensus about what constitutes this genre–or whether it should even be considered a distinct genre–examples of works that blur the line between autobiography and fiction have increased wildly over the past several decades in the US, Canada, Scandinavia, Germany, and elsewhere. Both the corpus and the conversation are expanding to encompass a range of texts and approaches by writers whose work falls between and beyond traditional publishing industry categories such as autobiography, memoir, confession, essay, and fiction. Some scholars are using this lens to trace lineages with earlier writers and genres such as the roman-ร -clef.
Autofiction has been touted by some as a productive response to the commodification, digitization, and proliferation of the self in a contemporary culture that has called the nature of โtruthโ and โfactโ into question. Others โ particularly racialized writers and womenโhave rejected the label, arguing that it overvalues or mischaracterizes the autobiographical dimension of their writing, further entrenching pernicious stereotypes. Is autofiction a reaction against the selfie, or simply another manifestation? Does the label refer to a new form of writing, or is it just a new way of describing metafictional techniques that have appeared in literature since The Canterbury Tales?
This special issue invites papers that consider these questions or any aspect of autofiction and its associated genres (autotheory, biofiction, creative nonfiction, etc.). Authors are welcome to discuss works that have been translated into English, and are particularly encouraged to focus on women, LGBTQ+, BIPOC, disabled, and otherwise marginalized writers.
Please submit abstracts of 500 words to Dr. Myra Bloom mbloom@glendon.yorku.ca by January 15, 2020. Final essays (6,000-9,000 words) are due August 15, 2020.
Categories: Non ACCUTE CFPs, Uncategorized